seinformatica.info

russia government info





On the other hand, online activity was still accompanied by mutual suspicion and incidents, especially since the Russian Internet is known as a space with a high degree of engagement of pro-government bloggers.

One may suggest that in an emergency situation there is a rise in the degree of trust, and, as a consequence, online cooperation grows more sustainable. This sustainability, however, is very fragile. Once the emergency decreases, the degree of suspicion and tension rises.

More sustainability requires more options to evaluate who your partners are and what their reputation is. It should not be a surprise that leaders of the online movement were well-known. Clippinger argues that the development of online trust through the development of online identity can create a new social reality with more advanced levels of cooperation and self-organization. The Russian wildfires case is another proof that “governance without government” requires a high degree of mutual trust. It also provides hope, since members of the online community have an opportunity to examine the track record of their fellows. It means that online cooperation not only requires a developed online identity, but is also a part of online identity development. As a consequence, next time when cooperation is required it can be based on trust that was developed previously.

Certain obstacles of online cooperation should be mentioned, though. One of them is the “Iron Law of Oligarchy” [ENG]. Suggested in 1911 by sociologist Robert Michels [EN], the “law” says that any form of organization develops competition for leadership and creates its own “oligarchs”. In an online environment, information hubs become oligarchs of sorts. If that happens, information hubs turn from cooperation to rivalry, thus threatening the efficiency of networked actions.

Another problem is the audience. LiveJournal blogs and communities primarily address active Internet users. Ushahidi-based “Help Map” tried to expand its audience by including SMS-messaging, but still information about the website is primarily distributed on the Internet. At the same time, the Russian “conventional” mass media (primarily TV) are controlled by the government and are instructed [RUS] to “avoid exaggeration and dramatization” of the wildfires. As a consequence, the audience available for online cooperation is limited.

Conclusion

In summer 2010, the Russian blogosphere became an example of “governance without government” that emerged in the conditions of the government's failure to handle the disaster. The mix of blogs, online communities and an Ushahidi-based platform, together with the emergence of new offline institutions to support this structure, provided a framework for relatively efficient and coordinated response.

Russia isn't the only example of this phenomenon. In his recent, still unpublished, report - “Mobile Telephony & Governance in Weak/Non-State Areas” - Steven Livingston [EN] from the George Washington University showed that information and communication technologies might be a catalyst for new forms of governance in weak and stateless areas. The report demonstrates how mobile phones can “create new sorts of institutions that allow people to manage issues (such as banking, security, and information for trade) more effectively” without the government's involvement. It means that cooperation mediated through technology gradually becomes a more significant alternative for governance by the government and a new framework for accountability, in various parts of the world. In this case, the Russian online response to the wildfires might be just one of many examples.

The problems of trust and relationship, as well as the limited ability of the Internet to reach more people, are still here.  One may add that once the government recognizes network as a potential rival for governance, it might take steps to restrict online cooperation.

I found this article very interesting, while I don’t agree with some of it I think you should read it.  Reading this reinforces the overseas work I am doing with Stand True.  I leave in a week for Belgium and Germany to speak at several youth events and the March for Life Berlin. I am excited to see how God uses the the work of Stand True in Europe.

Russia could be on the point of a significant change in direction on morality and sexual issues, as a major debate looms over the rights of women and unborn children.

A government resolution on abortion, approved last month, is the first restriction of any kind on the practice since a ban imposed by Stalin was lifted in 1955.

Russia is currently estimated to have nearly 13 terminations for every 10 live births, and the highest abortion rate in Europe after Romania.

The resolution, which went virtually unnoticed in the country’s media, envisages restrictions on women’s access to abortion after 12 weeks.

It is being hailed by anti-abortionists as a first step towards recognition of the rights of the unborn child.

Alexander Chuyev, a pro-life campaigner and independent deputy in the State Duma, described it as a “small victory”.

But some pro-choice campaigners see it as the thin end of the wedge.

“The resolution is the first step towards an attack on the rights of women,” Russian Family Planning Association director Inga Grebesheva told BBC News Online.

I agree that it is a small victory, but really it shows how much work needs to be done around the world to fight child killing.  What is hard for me to understand is if there should be any restrictions put on abortion, why?  Why is it that we government wants to restrict something that is supposedly just a small medical procedure like removing tonsils, or  a hangnail?  The only reason to restrict it is because it is taking a life and in that case it should be outlawed outright.

Previously, women in Russia could receive an abortion between 12 and 22 weeks of pregnancy by citing 13 special circumstances, including divorce, poverty and poor housing.

These have now been reduced to four:

  • Rape
  • Imprisonment
  • Death or severe disability of husband
  • Court ruling stripping of woman of parental rights

The measure is now irreversible, although it has still to go through the bureaucratic machinery of the Ministry of Health before it can be put into practice.

It may be that this will not make much of a dent in the overall statistics – officially only 7% of women who seek abortions do so between 12 and 22 weeks of pregnancy.

But Mr Chuyev told BBC News Online he was now pushing for a law to protect the rights of children, including the unborn.

He hopes that any new measure will provide for the right to medical help for both the mother and the child, potentially making it harder for women to abort for medical reasons – something which has not been affected by the current resolution.

One factor which may have given the pro-lifers’ message more resonance with the government is the rapid decline in Russia’s population, which could shrink by as much as 30 million in the next few decades.

But experts say the resolution will not fundamentally affect the country’s birth rate.

“Women are very decisive,” Victoria Sakevich, abortion specialist at the Academy of Sciences’ Laboratory for the Analysis and Forecasting of Human Reproduction, told BBC News Online. “If they don’t want to give birth, they’ll find ways to have abortions.”

It seems that the Russian government has finally seen the truth about the overpopulation lie; they realize they will be in big trouble in the future when the population starts to dive.

The exceptions they have kept in place that still allow women to kill their children must also be closed off; there is no excuse for killing an innocent child in the womb.

The so called “abortion specialist”, Victoria gives one of the weakest arguments for why abortion should remain legal, “If they don’t want to give birth, they’ll find ways to have abortions.”  This is so ludicrous; just because people are going to commit a crime does not mean we should decriminalize that crime.  People commit the crime of rape everyday, should we go ahead and make it legal because they are going to do it anyway?  Of course not.  The same should be said about killing one’s child in the womb; we keep it legal just because people will continue to do it.  The fact is that the killing of an innocent baby is wrong and we must protect the rights of all babies to live.

Education problem

Most pro-choice campaigners agree that something must be done to reduce the abortion rate, but they say that the most important priority is education, the lack of which is in itself contributing to population decline.

Many couples in Russia are infertile because of poor access to information about sexually transmitted diseases, Dr Grebesheva says, and some women are infertile because of abortions which would have been unnecessary had they had access to contraceptives.

Almost everyone agrees on the need for some form of education for adolescents, but that is about as far as the consensus goes.

There is no real programme for sex education in schools despite a 10-year discussion in government, a fact which incenses many campaigners.

“A 14-year-old receives no sex education but he can already be convicted for the crime of rape,” says Dr Grebesheva.

Here again they are claiming that the abortion rate must be lowered, why?  Why must you lower it if there is nothing wrong with it.  Maybe, just maybe, if it is wrong enough to lower the rate you should think about eliminating the rate.

I can go into a whole book about school based sex education, but I will save this for another post.  I will ask a question though.  Why is it that pro-abortion activists wants to keep the government out of our bedrooms but wants to teach our kids how and what to do when it comes to sex?

‘Widespread ignorance’

As it happens, the number of abortions has been falling in recent years, from a peak of 4.6 million in 1988 to under 1.8 million last year.

This suggests that knowledge about and availability of contraception is having some impact on sexual activity.

But Juliette Engels, the founding director of Moscow’s Miramed institute – which runs a programme for single parents and women on low incomes – casts doubt on these figures, saying that half of all abortions are not recorded.

She is particularly concerned about the problem of pregnancies in orphanages, where children often live through puberty together without any proper adult supervision. These pregnancies are often not known about until after 12 weeks.

So the resolution may have more of an impact than some might think.

But the underlying problem, she suggests, is that the government simply lacks the will to tackle the broader issues. ”Russia has every resource it needs to address social problems, if it wants to survive,” she said.

The broader issue the government needs to attack is establishing the personhood rights of every single human person from the moment of fertilization to natural death.

Bryan Kemper

The This article from the BBC - http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3093152.stm

info on ancient greece food





Meals

Terracotta model representing a lion’s paw tripod table, 2nd1st century BCE, from Myrina, Louvre

At home

The Greeks had four meals a day. Breakfast ( akratismos) consisted of barley bread dipped in wine ( akratos), sometimes complemented by figs or olives. A quick lunch ( ariston) was taken around noon or early afternoon. Dinner ( deipnon), the most important meal of the day, was generally taken at nightfall. An additional light meal ( hesperisma) was sometimes taken in the late afternoon. / aristodeipnon, literally “lunch-dinner”, was served in the late afternoon instead of dinner.

Men and women took their meals separately. When the house was too small, the men ate first, the women afterwards. Slaves waited at dinners. Aristotle notes that “the poor, having no slaves, must use their wives and children as servants”.

The ancient Greek custom to place terra cotta miniatures of their furniture in children’s graves gives us a good idea of its style and design. The Greeks normally ate while seated on chairs; benches were used for banquets. The tables, high for normal meals and low for banquets, were initially rectangular in shape. But by the 4th century BCE, the usual table was round, often with animal-shaped legs (for example lion’s paws). Loaves of flat bread could be used as plates, but terra cotta bowls were more common. Dishes became more refined over time, and by the Roman period plates were sometimes made out of precious metals or glass. Cutlery was not often used at table: Use of the fork was unknown; people ate with their fingers. Knives were used to cut the meat. Spoons were used for soups and broths. Pieces of bread ( apomagdalia) could be used to spoon the food or as napkins, to wipe the fingers.

Social dining

Banqueter playing the kottabos, a playful subversion of the libation, ca. 510 BCE, Louvre

As with modern dinner parties, the host could simply invite friends or family; but two other forms of social dining were central in ancient Greece: the entertainment of the all-male symposium, and the obligatory, regimental syssitia.

Symposium

Main article: Symposium

The symposium ( symposion), traditionally translated as “banquet”, but more literally “gathering of drinkers”, was one of the preferred pastimes for the Greeks. It consisted of two parts: the first dedicated to food, generally rather simple, and a second part dedicated to drinking. However, wine was consumed with the food, and the beverages were accompanied by snacks ( tragmata) such as chestnuts, beans, toasted wheat, or honey cakes; all designed to absorb alcohol and extend the drinking spree.

The second part was inaugurated with a libation, most often in honor of Dionysus, followed by conversation or table games, such as kottabos. The guests would recline on couches ( klinai); low tables held the food or game boards. Dancers, acrobats, and musicians would entertain the wealthy banqueters. A “king of the banquet” was drawn by lots; he had the task of directing the slaves as to how strong to mix the wine.

With the exception of dancers and courtesans, the banquet was strictly reserved for men. It was an essential element of Greek social life. Great feasts could only be afforded by the rich; in most Greek homes, religious feasts or family events were the occasion of more modest banquets. The banquet became the setting of a specific genre of literature, giving birth to Plato’s Symposium, Xenophon’s work of the same name, the Table Talk of Plutarch’s Moralia, and the Deipnosophists (Banquet of the Learned) of Athenaeus.

Syssitia

Main article: Syssitia

The syssitia ( ta syssitia) were mandatory meals shared by social or religious groups for men and youths, especially in Crete and Sparta. They were referred to variously as hetairia, pheiditia, or andreia (literally, “belonging to men”). They both served as a kind of aristocratic club and as a military mess. Like the symposium, the syssitia was the exclusive domain of men although some references have been found to all-female syssitia. Unlike the symposium, these meals were hallmarked by simplicity and temperance.

Foods

Bread

Woman kneading bread, c. 500475 BCE, National Archaeological Museum of Athens

Cereals formed the staple diet. The two main grains were wheat ( sitos) and barley. Wheat grains were softened by soaking, then either reduced into gruel, or ground into flour ( aleiata) and kneaded and formed into loaves ( artos) or flatbreads, either plain or mixed with cheese or honey. Leavening was known; the Greeks later used an alkali ( nitron) or wine yeast as leavening agent. Dough loaves were baked at home in a clay oven ( ipnos) set on legs. A simpler method consisted in putting lighted coals on the floor and covering the heap with a dome-shaped cover ( pnigeus); when it was hot enough, the coals were swept aside, dough loaves were placed on the warm floor, the cover was put back in place and the coals were gathered on the side of the cover. The stone oven did not appear until the Roman period. Solon, an Athenian lawmaker of the 6th century BCE, prescribed that leavened bread be reserved for feast days. By the end of the 5th century BC, leavened bread was sold at the market, though it was expensive.

Barley was easier to produce but more difficult to make bread from. It provided a nourishing but very heavy bread. Because of this it was often roasted before milling, producing a coarse flour ( alphita) which was used to make maza, the basic Greek dish. In Peace, Aristophanes employs the expression , literally “to eat only barley”, with a meaning equivalent to the English “diet of bread and water”. Many recipes for maza are known; it could be served cooked or raw, as a broth, or made into dumplings or flatbreads. Like wheat breads, it could also be augmented with cheese or honey.

Fruit and vegetables

The cereals were often served accompanied by what was generically referred to as opson, “relish”. The word initially meant anything prepared on the fire, and, by extension, anything which accompanied bread. In the classical period it came to refer to fish and vegetables: cabbage, onions, lentils, sweet peas, chickpeas, broad beans, garden peas, grass peas, etc. They were eaten as a soup, boiled or mashed ( etnos), seasoned with olive oil, vinegar, herbs or gron, a fish sauce similar to Vietnamese n m. According to Aristophanes, mashed beans were a favourite dish of Heracles, always represented as a glutton in comedies. Poor families ate oak acorns ( balanoi).. Raw or preserved olives were a common appetizer.

In the cities, fresh vegetables were expensive: the poorer city dwellers had to make do with dried vegetables. Lentil soup ( phak) was the workman’s typical dish. Cheese, garlic and onions were the soldier’s traditional fare. In Peace, the smell of onions typically represents soldiers; the chorus, celebrating the end of war, sings Oh! joy, joy! no more helmet, no more cheese nor onions! Bitter vetch was considered a famine food.

Fruits, fresh or dried, and nuts, were eaten as dessert. Important fruits were figs, raisins and pomegranates. Dried figs were also eaten as an appetizer or when drinking wine. In the latter case, they were often accompanied by grilled chestnuts, chick peas, and beechnuts.

Fish and Meat

Sacrifice; principal source of meat for city dwellers here a boar; tondo of an Attic kylix by the Epidromos Painter, c. 510500 BCE, Louvre

The consumption of fish and meat varied in accordance with the wealth and location of the household; in the country, hunting (primarily trapping) allowed for consumption of birds and hares. Peasants also had farmyards to provide them with chickens and geese. Slightly wealthier landowners could raise goats, pigs, or sheep. In the city, meat was expensive except for pork. In Aristophanes’ day a piglet cost three drachmas, which was three days wages for a public servant. Sausages were common both for the poor and the rich.

In the 8th century BCE Hesiod describes the ideal country feast in Works and Days:

But at that time let me have a shady rock and Bibline wine, a clot of curds and milk of drained goats with the flesh of a heifer fed in the woods, that has never calved, and of firstling kids; then also let me drink bright wine

Meat is much less prominent in texts of the 5th century BCE onwards than in the earliest poetry, but this may be a matter of genre rather than real evidence of changes in farming and food customs. The eating of fresh meat was accompanied by a religious ritual in which the gods’ share (fat and bones) was burnt while the human share (meat) was grilled and distributed to the participants; there was however a lively trade in cooked and salted meats, which demanded no ritual.

Spartans primarily ate pork stew, the “black broth” ( melas zmos). According to Plutarch, it was “so much valued that the elderly men fed only upon that, leaving what flesh there was to the younger”. It was famous amongst the Greeks. “Naturally Spartans are the bravest men in the world”, joked a Sybarite, “anyone in his senses would rather die ten thousand times than take his share of such a sorry diet”. It was made with pork, salt, vinegar and blood. The dish was served with maza, figs and cheese sometimes supplemented with game and fish. The 2nd3rd century author Aelian, claims that Spartan cooks were prohibited from cooking anything other than meat.

In the Greek islands and on the coast, fresh fish and seafood (squid, octopus, and shellfish) were common. They were eaten locally but more often transported inland. Sardines and anchovies were regular fare for the citizens of Athens. They were sometimes sold fresh, but more frequently salted. A stele of the late 3rd century BCE from the small Boeotian city of Akraiphia, on Lake Copais, provides us with a list of fish prices. The cheapest was skaren (probably parrotfish) whereas northern bluefin tuna was three times as expensive. Common salt water fish were yellowfin tuna, red mullet, ray, swordfish or sturgeon, a delicacy which was eaten salted. Lake Copais itself was famous in all Greece for its eels, celebrated by the hero of The Acharnians. Other fresh water fish were pike-fish, carp and the less appreciated catfish.

Eggs and dairy products

Greeks bred quails and hens, partly for their eggs. Some authors also praise pheasant eggs and Egyptian Goose eggs, which were presumably rather rare. Eggs were cooked soft- or hard-boiled as hors d’uvre or dessert. Whites, yolks and whole eggs were also used as ingredients in the preparation of dishes.

Country dwellers drank milk ( gala), but it was seldom used in cooking. Butter ( bouturon) was known but seldom used either: Greeks saw it as a culinary trait of the Thracians of the northern Aegean coast, whom the Middle Comic poet Anaxandrides dubbed “butter eaters”. Yet Greeks enjoyed other dairy products. Pyriat, was a kind of thick milk, commonly mistaken as yogurt. Most of all, goat’s and ewe’s cheese () tyros) was a staple food. Fresh and hard cheese were sold in different shops; the former cost about two thirds of the latter’s price. Cheese was eaten alone or with honey or vegetables. It was also used as an ingredient in the preparation of many dishes, including fish dishes. The only extant recipe by the Sicilian cook Mithaecus runs: “Tainia: gut, discard the head, rinse and fillet; add cheese and olive oil”. However, the addition of cheese seems to have been a controversial matter; Archestratus warns his readers that Syracusan cooks spoil good fish by adding cheese.

Drink

Attican Rhyton, c. 460450 BCE, National Archaeological Museum of Athens

The most widespread drink was water. Fetching water was a daily task for women. Though wells were common, spring water was preferred: it was recognized as nutritious because it caused plants and trees to grow, and also as a desirable beverage. Pindar called spring water “as agreeable as honey”. The Greeks would describe water as robust, heavy or light, dry, acidic, pungent, wine-like, etc. One of the comic poet Antiphanes’s characters claimed that he could recognize Attic water by taste alone. Athenaeus states that a number of philosophers had a reputation for drinking nothing but water, a habit combined with a vegetarian diet (cf. below). Milk, usually goats’ milk, was also consumed.

The usual drinking vessel was the skyphos, made out of wood, terra cotta, or metal. Critias also mentions the kothon, a Spartan goblet which had the military advantage of hiding the colour of the water from view and trapping mud in its edge. They also used a drinking vessel called a kylix (a shallow footed bowl), and for banquets the kantharos (a deep cup with handles) or the rhyton, a drinking horn often moulded into the form of a human or animal head.

Wine

See also: Ancient Greece and wine

Banqueter reaches into a krater with an oenochoe to replenish his kylix with wine, c. 490480 BCE, Louvre

The Greeks are thought to have made red as well as ros and white wines. As at the present time, many qualities of production were to be found, from common table wine to vintage qualities. The best wines, in general opinion, came from Thsos, Lesbos and Chios. Cretan wine came to prominence later. A secondary wine made from water and pomace (the residue from squeezed grapes), mixed with lees, was made by country people for their own use. The Greeks sometimes sweetened their wine with honey and made medicinal wines by adding thyme, pennyroyal and other herbs. By the first century, if not before, they were familiar with wine flavoured with pine resin (modern retsina). Aelian also mentions a wine mixed with perfume. Cooked wine was known, as well as a sweet wine from Thsos, similar to port wine.

Wine was generally cut with water. The drinking of akraton or “unmixed wine”, though known to be practised by northern barbarians, was thought likely to lead to madness and death. Wine was mixed in a krater, from which the slaves would fill the drinker’s kylix with an oinochoe (jugs). Wine was also used as a generic medication, being taken to have medicinal virtue. Aelian mentions that the wine from Heraia in Arcadia rendered men foolish but women fertile; conversely, Achaean wine was thought to induce abortion. Outside of these therapeutic uses, Greek society did not approve of women drinking wine; according to Aelian, a Massalian law prohibited this and restricted women to drinking water. Sparta was the only city where women routinely drank wine.

Wine reserved for local use was kept in skins. That destined for sale was poured into pithoi, (large terra cotta jugs). From here they were decanted into amphoras sealed with pitch for retail sale. Vintage wines carried stamps from the producers and/or city magistrates who guaranteed their origin. This is one of the first instances of indicating the geographical or qualitative provenance of a product, and is the basis of the modern appellations d’origine contrles certification.

Kykeon

Hecamede preparing kykeon for Nestor, kylix by the Brygos Painter, ca. 490 BC, Louvre

The Greeks also drank kykeon (, from kyka, “to shake, to mix”), which was both a beverage and a meal. It was a barley gruel, to which water and herbs were added. In the Iliad, the beverage also contained grated goat cheese. In the Odyssey, Circe adds honey and a magic potion to it. In the Homeric Hymn to Demeter, the goddess refuses red wine but accepts a kykeon made of water, flour, and pennyroyal. Used as a ritual beverage in the Eleusinian Mysteries, it was also a popular beverage, especially in the countryside: Theophrastus, in his Characters, describes a boorish peasant as having drunk much kykeon and inconveniencing the Assembly with his bad breath. It also had a reputation as a good digestive, and as such, in Peace, Hermes recommends it to the main character who has eaten too much dried fruit.

Food preparation

Food played an important part in the Greek mode of thought. Classicist John Wilkins notes that “in the Odyssey for example, good men are distinguished from bad and Greeks from foreigners partly in terms of how and what they ate. Herodotus identified people partly in terms of food and eating”.

Up to the 3rd century BCE, the frugality imposed by the physical and climatic conditions of the country was held as virtuous. The Greeks did not ignore the pleasures of eating, but valued simplicity. The rural writer Hesiod, as cited above, spoke of his “flesh of a heifer fed in the woods, that has never calved, and of firstling kids” as being the perfect closing to a day. Nonetheless, Chrysippus is quoted as saying that the best meal was a free one.

Culinary and gastronomical research was rejected as a sign of oriental flabbiness: the Persian Empire was considered decadent due to their luxurious taste, which manifested itself in their cuisine. The Greek authors took pleasure in describing the table of the Achaemenid Great King and his court: Herodotus, Clearchus of Soli, Strabo and Ctesias were unanimous in their descriptions.

Fresh fish, one of the favourite dishes of the Greeks, platter with red figures, c. 350325 BCE, Louvre

In contrast, Greeks as a whole stressed the austerity of their own diet. Plutarch tells how the king of Pontus, eager to try the Spartan “black gruel”, bought a Laconian cook; “but had no sooner tasted it than he found it extremely bad, which the cook observing, told him, “Sir, to make this broth relish, you should have bathed yourself first in the river Evrotas”.”. According to Polyaenus, on discovering the dining hall of the Persian royal palace, Alexander the Great mocked their taste and blamed it for their defeat. Pausanias, on discovering the dining habits of the Persian commander Mardonius, equally ridiculed the Persians, “who having so much, came to rob the Greeks of their miserable living”.

In consequence of this cult of frugality, and the diminished regard for cuisine it inspired, the kitchen long remained the domain of women, free or enslaved. In the classical period, however, culinary specialists began to enter the written record. Both Aelian and Athenaeus mention the thousand cooks who accompanied Smindyride of Sybaris on his voyage to Athens at the time of Cleisthenes, if only disapprovingly. Plato in Gorgias, mentions “Thearion the cook, Mithaecus the author of a treatise on Sicilian cooking, and Sarambos the wine merchant; three eminent connoisseurs of cake, kitchen and wine.” Some chefs also wrote treatises on cuisine.

Over time, more and more Greeks presented themselves as gourmets. From the Hellenistic to the Roman period, the Greeks at least the rich no longer appeared to be any more austere than others. The cultivated guests of the feast hosted by Athenaeus in the 2nd or 3rd century devoted a large part of their conversation to wine and gastronomy. They discussed the merits of various wines, vegetables, and meats, mentioning renowned dishes (stuffed cuttlefish, red tuna belly, prawns, lettuce watered with mead) and great cooks such as Soterides, chef to king Nicomedes I of Bithynia (who reigned from the 279 to 250 BCE). When his master was inland, he pined for anchovies; Soterides simulated them from carefully carved turnips, oiled, salted and sprinkled with poppy seeds. Suidas (an encyclopaedia from the Byzantine period) mistakenly attributes this exploit to the celebrated Roman gourmet Apicius (1st century BCE) 89] which may be taken as evidence that the Greeks had reached the same level as the Romans.

Specific diets

Vegetarianism

Triptolemus received wheat sheaves from Demeter and blessings from Persephone, 5th century BCE relief, National Archaeological Museum of Athens

Orphicism and Pythagoreanism, two common ancient Greek religions, suggested a different way of life, based on a concept of purity and thus purification ( katharsis) a form of asceticism in the original sense: asksis initially signifies a ritual, then a specific way of life. Vegetarianism was a central element of Orphicism and of several variants of Pythagoreanism.

Empedocles (5th century BCE) justified vegetarianism by a belief in the transmigration of souls: who could guarantee that an animal about to be slaughtered did not house the soul of a human being? However, it can be observed that Empedocles also included plants in this transmigration, thus the same logic should have applied to eating them. Vegetarianism was also a consequence of a dislike for killing: “For Orpheus taught us rites and to refrain from killing”.

The information from Pythagoras (6th century BCE) is more difficult to define. The Comedic authors such as Aristophon and Alexis described Pythagoreans as strictly vegetarian, with some of them living on bread and water alone. Other traditions contented themselves with prohibiting the consumption of certain vegetables, such as the broad bean, or of sacred animals such as the white cock or selected animal parts.

It follows that vegetarianism and the idea of ascetic purity were closely associated, and often accompanied by sexual abstinence. In On the eating of flesh, Plutarch (1st2nd century) elaborated on the barbarism of blood-spilling; inverting the usual terms of debate, he asked the meat-eater to justify his choice.

The Neoplatonic Porphyrius (3rd century) associates in On Abstinence vegetarianism with the Cretan mystery cults, and gives a census of past vegetarians, starting with the semi-mythical Epimenides. For him, the origin of vegetarianism was Demeter’s gift of wheat to Triptolemus so that he could teach agriculture to humanity. His three commandments were: “Honour your parents”, “Honour the gods with fruit”, and pare the animals”.

Athlete diets

Aelian claims that the first athlete to submit to a formal diet was Ikkos of Tarentum, a victor in the Olympic pentathlon (perhaps in 444 BC). However, Olympic wrestling champion (62nd through 66th Olympiads) Milo of Croton was already said to eat twenty pounds of meat and twenty pounds of bread and to drink eight quarts of wine each day. Before his time, athletes were said to practise xrophaga (from xros, “dry”), a diet based on dry foods such as dried figs, fresh cheese and bread. Pythagoras (either the philosopher or a gymnastics master of the same name) was the first to direct athletes to eat meat.

Trainers later enforced some standard diet rules: to be an Olympic victor, “you have to eat according to regulations, keep away from desserts (); you must not drink cold water nor can you have a drink of wine whenever you want”. It seems this diet was primarily based on meat, for Galen (ca. 180 AD) accused athletes of his day of “always gorging themselved on flesh and blood”. Pausanias also refers to a “meat diet”.

Notes

^ ^ The expression originates in Sir Colin Renfrew’s The Emergence of Civilisation: The Cyclades and the Aegean in The Third Millennium BC, 1972, p.280.

^ Flacelire, p.205.

^ At the time of Homer and the early tragedies, the term signified the first meal of the day, which was not necessarily frugal: in Iliad 24:124, Achilles’s companions slaughter a sheep for breakfast.

^ a b c Flacelire, p.206.

^ Alexis fgt.214 Kock = Athenaeus 47e.

^ Dalby, p.5.

^ Dalby, p.15.

^ Politics 1323a4.

^ Dalby, pp.1314.

^ a b c d Flacelire, p.209.

^ a b Sparkes, p.132.

^ Aristophanes Knights 41316; Pollux 6.93.

^ a b Flacelire, p.212.

^ Flacelire, p.213.

^ a b Flacelire, p.215.

^ Dalby, pp.9091.

^ a b Migeotte, p.62.

^ Galen, On the properties of Food 1.10; Dalby p.91.

^ Sparkes, p.127.

^ Sparkes, p.128.

^ Flacelire, p.207.

^ Aristophanes, Frogs 858 and Wasps 238.

^ Dalby, p.91.

^ Peace 449.

^ Dalby, p.22.

^ Scholia to Homer, Iliad’ 11.630.

^ See Kimberly-Hatch.

^ The Frogs 6263.

^ Dalby, p.89.

^ Dalby, p.23.

^ Dalby, p.90; Flint-Hamilton, p.75.

^ Flacelire, p.208.

^ Peace 11271129. Peace. trans. Eugene O’Neill, Jr. 1938. accessed 23 May 2006.

^ Demosthenes, Against Androtion 15.

^ Peace 374.

^ Sparkes, p.123.

^ Hesiod. Works and Days 58893, trans. Hugh G. Evelyn-White 1914. accessed 23 May 2006

^ Life of Lycurgus 12:12.

^ Apud Athenaeus 138d, trans. quoted by Dalby, p.126.

^ Life of Lycurgus 12:3 and Dichaearchus fgt.72 Wehrli.

^ Various History 14:7.

^ Dalby, p.67.

^ Athenaeus, Epitome 58b.

^ Dalby, p.65.

^ Athenaeus 151b.

^ Galen, On the properties of food, 3.15.

^ Dalby, p.66.

^ Athenaeus 325f.

^ Athenaeus 40f41a commenting on Odyssey 17.208.

^ Athenaeus 41a commenting on Iliad 2.753.

^ Pindar, fgt.198 B4.

^ smatds, Athenaeus 42a.

^ barystathmoteros, Athenaeus 42c.

^ kouphos, Athenaeus 42c.

^ kataxros, Athenaeus 43a.

^ oxys, Theopompus fgt.229 M. I316 = Athenaeus 43b.

^ trakuteros, Athenaeus 43b.

^ oinds, Athenaeus 42c.

^ Antiphanes fgt.179 Kock = Athenaeus 43b.

^ Athenaeus 44.

^ Apud Plutarch, Life of Lycurgus, 9:78.

^ Athenaeus 28d.

^ First mention in Dioscorides, Materia Medica 5.34; Dalby, p.150.

^ Various History 12:31.

^ Athenaeus 31d.

^ E.g. Menander, Samia 394.

^ Various History, 13:6.

^ Various History, 2:38.

^ Dalby, p.889.

^ Iliad 15:638641.

^ Odyssey 10:234.

^ Homeric hymn to Demeter 208.

^ Characters 4:23.

^ Peace 712.

^ Wilkins, “Introduction: part II” in Wilkins, Harvey and Dobson, p.3.

^ Apud Athenaeus 8c.

^ For a comparison of Persian and Greek cuisine, see Briant, pp.297306.

^ Herodotus 1:133.

^ Apud Athenaeus 539b.

^ Description of Greece 15:3,22.

^ Ctesias fgt.96 M = Athenaeus 67a.

^ Plutarch, Life of Lycurgus 12:13, trans. John Dryden. Accessed 26 May 2006.

^ Stratagems, 4:3,32.

^ Stratagems 4:82.

^ Various History 22:24.

^ Gorgias 518b.

^ Euphro Comicus fgt.11 Kock = Athenaeus 7d.

^ Suidas s.v. .

^ Dodds, pp.1545.

^ Aristophanes, Frogs 1032. Trans. Matthew Dillon, accessed 2 June 2006.

^ Flint-Hamilton, pp.379380.

^ Moralia 12:68.

^ On Abstinence 4.62.

^ Various History (11:3).

^ Athenaeus 412f.

^ Athenaeus 205.

^ Diogenes Laertius 8:12.

^ Epictetus, Discourses 15:25, trans. W.E. Sweet.

^ Exhortation for Medicine 9, trans. S.G. Miller.

^ Pausanias 6:7.10.

See also

Greek cuisine

References

Briant, P. Histoire de l’Empire perse de Cyrus Alexandre. Paris: Fayard, 1996. ISBN 2-213-59667-0, translated in English as From Cyrus to Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire. Winona Lake, Ind.: Eisenbrauns, 2002 ISBN 1-57506-031-0

Dalby, A. Siren Feasts: A History of Food and Gastronomy in Greece. London: Routledge, 1996. ISBN 0-415-15657-2

Dodds, E.R. “The Greek Shamans and the Origins of Puritanism “, The Greek and the Irrational (Sather Classical Lectures). Berkeley: University of California Press, 1962 (1st edn 1959).

Flacelire R. La Vie quotidienne en Grce au temps de Pricls. Paris: Hachette, 1988 (1st edn. 1959) ISBN 2-01-005966-2, translated in English as Daily Life in Greece at the Time of Pericles. London: Phoenix Press, 2002 ISBN 1-84212-507-9

Flint-Hamilton, K.B. “Legumes in Ancient Greece and Rome: Food, Medicine, or Poison?”, Hesperia, Vol.68, No.3 (Jul.ep., 1999), pp. 371385.

(French) Migeotte, L., L’conomie des cits grecques. Paris: Ellipses, 2002 ISBN 2-7298-0849-3

Sparkes, B.A. “The Greek Kitchen”, The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Vol.82, 1962 (1962), pp. 121137.

Wilkins, J., Harvey, D. and Dobson, M. Food in Antiquity. Exeter: University of Exeter Press, 1995. ISBN 0-85989-418-5

Further reading

(French) Amouretti, M.-Cl. Le Pain et l’huile dans la Grce antique. De l’araire au moulin. Paris: Belles Lettres, 1989.

(French) Delatte, A. Le Cycon, breuvage rituel des mystres d’leusis. Paris: Belles Lettres, 1955.

Detienne, M. and Vernant, J.-P. (trans. Wissing, P.). The Cuisine of Sacrifice Among the Greeks. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1989 (1st edn. 1979) ISBN 0-226-14353-8

External links

(French) “Vgtarisme, au commencement” (French language article on origin of vegetarianism)

A Taste of the Ancient World (University of Michigan)

v  d  e

History of cuisine

Ancient Egyptian cuisine  Ancient Greek cuisine  Ancient Roman cuisine  Cuisine of the Thirteen Colonies  Maya cuisine  Andean cuisine  Aztec cuisine  Byzantine cuisine  Medieval cuisine  Ottoman cuisine  Early modern European cuisine   History of Chinese cuisine   History of French cuisine   History of Hawaiian cuisine   History of Italian cuisine   History of Japanese cuisine   History of Jewish cuisine   History of Polish cuisine   History of Scottish cuisine

v  d  e

Ancient Greece topics

Timeline

Cycladic civilization  Minoan civilization  Mycenaean civilization  Greek Dark Ages  Archaic period  Classical Greece  Hellenistic Greece  Roman Greece

Geography

Aegean Sea  Hellespont  Macedonia  Sparta  Athens  Corinth  Thebes  Thermopylae  Ionian Sea  Ionia  Aeolis  Doris  Antioch  Alexandria  Pergamon  Miletus  Ephesus  Delphi  Delos   Olympia  Troy  Rhodes  Crete  Peloponnesus  Epirus  Cyprus  Pontus  Magna Grecia  Ancient Greek Colonies

Life

Agriculture  Cuisine  Democracy  Economy  Education  Law  Prostitution  Religion  Slavery  Olympic Games  Philosophy  Warfare   Wine

People

Philosophers

Anaxagoras  Anaximander  Anaximenes  Antisthenes  Aristotle  Democritus  Demonax  Diogenes of Sinope  Epicurus  Empedocles  Heraclitus  Leucippus  Gorgias  Parmenides  Plato  Protagoras  Pythagoras  Socrates  Thales  Zeno

Authors

Aeschylus  Aesop  Aristophanes  Euripides  Herodotus  Hesiod  Homer  Lucian  Menander  Pindar  Plutarch  Polybius  Sappho  Sophocles  Theognis of Megara  Thucydides  Xenophon

Others

Alexander the Great  Alcibiades  Archimedes  Aspasia  Coroebus of Elis  Demonax  Demosthenes  Euclid  Hippocrates  Leonidas  Lycurgus  Milo of Croton   Pericles  Solon  Themistocles

Buildings

Parthenon  Temple of Artemis  Acropolis  Ancient Agora  Temple of Zeus at Olympia  Temple of Hephaestus  Samothrace temple complex

Arts

Architecture  Coinage  Literature  Music  Pottery  Sculpture  Theatre

Sciences

Astronomy  Mathematics  Medicine  Technology

Language

Proto-Greek  Mycenaean   Homeric  Dialects (Aeolic  Arcadocypriot  Attic  Doric  Ionic  Locrian  Macedonian  Pamphylian)  Koine

Categories: Ancient Greek cuisine | Greek cuisine | Historical foodsHidden categories: Articles containing Ancient Greek language text | Articles needing cleanup from September 2009 | All pages needing cleanup | Wikipedia introduction cleanup from September 2009

I am a professional writer from China Manufacturers, which contains a great deal of information about planer knives , hole saw arbor, welcome to visit!

GHTime Code(s): 5e76d 

Chinese are welcome to visit Greece all year round, the Greek Secretary General of Tourism George Poussaios told China.org.cn Tuesday in Beijing after a cultural exchange deal was signed between China and Greece.

“As far as I know we have 10 times more Greek citizens visiting China,” said Mr. Poussaios, expressing the hope that more Chinese can be persuaded to take a trip to Greece. He said Greece is simplifying its visa application procedures to make it easier and faster for Chinese tourists to get visas.

He also said he expects direct flights between Greece and China to be available before too long, adding that his ministry is negotiating with airlines to make it happen. “Greece as a tourist destination is quite cheap in comparison with other European countries,” said Mr. Poussaios, adding that people visiting the country can nevertheless expect high quality service.

Chinese tourists in Greece can visit its ancient temples and museums, enjoy the beautiful landscape, taste delicious Greek food, and even get married, he said in an exclusive interview with China.org.cn.

They can also explore the hundreds of beautiful Greek islands such as Santorini, Mykonos, Corfu, and Paros on popular four-day and seven-day cruises from the mainland, said Mr. Poussaios.

information number phone





It’s now possible to find a person by their phone number alone. Thanks to the Internet, finding long-lost relatives, classmates or friends is very easy. With the help of some online tools, you will be able to find a person by their phone number in no time at all. Doing reverse phone number searches allows you to find whoever you’re looking for in a flash. You just type in the information you have, hit “enter” and the results pages come up in seconds. The Quickest Way to Find A Person by Phone Number If all you’ve got is a phone number, you first want to find out if it’s a landline or a mobile number. There are a lot of free tools on the Internet that allow you to find this out immediately. Once you know the type of phone number, it’s time to visit the major search engines. Most of these search engines provide free reverse lookups for landlines. Follow this format when typing in phone numbers: (123) 456-7890. The names and addresses of the owners of the numbers will show up in the results pages. Some of the sites allow you to type in telephone numbers for free while it searches for matching names and addresses. Other free websites let you search for just one phone number using several Internet directories. Keep in mind that when you do people searches using phone numbers, that the names that appear in the results pages are those of individuals under whose names the numbers are registered. The free sites do not provide information concerning unlisted or cellular phone numbers. So how do people go about locating owners of unlisted phone numbers or cell phone listings? Well, doing a reverse cell look up can be tougher than reverse landline searches. You might want to go online and hire a private investigator to help you out. The prices tend to vary but you normally pay upwards of $80 for this kind of service. Companies will usually provide a refund if they fail to obtain the information you need. An easier and far more affordable way to find cell phone listings is to do a reverse cell look up yourself. It costs much less and you will have your answer in minutes.    

Leave a Comment

Name

Mail (will not be published)


Website


Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.


Forward Phone Searches

A forward phone search is the exact opposite of a reverse search. Instead of using a person’s phone number to locate their name and address, a forward search uses their name to locate their number.

Conducting a forward phone search is completely legal when locating a land line number. The reason for this is that land line numbers are available in a variety of different mediums, such as the white pages. Anyone can pick up a phone book and search for a person’s name and find their phone number.

Forward cell phone searches, on the other hand, are not legal. The reason for this is that cell phone numbers are not considered public record, which means that they are not freely available. Cell phone numbers are considered to be more personal information than land line numbers.

Additionally, cell phones are charged for both outgoing and incoming calls as opposed to land line phones, which are only charged for outgoing calls. This means that if cell phone numbers were publicly available, not only would telemarketers have access to cell phone numbers, but people would also be charged for every irritating telemarketing call they received.

Looking up cell phone numbers can be done very quickly and easily. In fact, a person could receive a call from an anonymous caller and discover that person’s identity within minutes of the call.

By using a reverse cell phone search, any masked caller can quickly be identified and dealt with.

(Suite101 would encourage readers to consult legal advice before acting on any advice given in this article due to the sensitive nature of the information that it discusses.)